01 - evidence-first
Linked to real work
Every experiment we propose links back to real pull requests and commits, with timestamps. Nothing rests on memory or guesswork.
For Australian software companies
We read your pull requests, interview your engineers, and produce an evidence-backed R&D Tax Incentive claim package your tax adviser can review and lodge.
No login to get an estimate. We prepare the claim; your registered adviser lodges it.
[ 002 ] - why it holds up
01 - evidence-first
Every experiment we propose links back to real pull requests and commits, with timestamps. Nothing rests on memory or guesswork.
02 - conservative
We help you scope routine work out, not inflate a number. A claim that cannot be defended is worse than no claim at all.
03 - adviser-ready
You get a structured, citable package built around the statutory four-gate test, ready for your tax agent to review and file.
[ 003 ] - from commits to claim
01
Point us at one or more repositories. We support multiple repos per company.
02
Pull requests, the contributors behind them, and timestamps. We set routine work aside.
03
We ask your engineers specific questions grounded in the actual code changes.
04
Confirmed experiments, substantiation, linked evidence, and an offset estimate.
[ 004 ] - who it's for
If your engineers regularly hit problems where the answer was not known up front, and you spend more than $20,000 a year working them out, there is a good chance you can claim. Four questions, under a minute.
the four-question self-check
Four yeses means you are a strong candidate.
[ 005 ] - security & data handling
Security
Read-only access, kept private
We connect to your repository read-only and read your pull requests, commits, and the code behind them to find candidate R&D, and you confirm every experiment before anything goes in the package.
[ 006 ] - the number
A rough estimate in two minutes, then build the substantiated number when you are ready.